Wikipedia:Files for deletion |
|
|
|
Files for deletion
Files for deletion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which are unneeded. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for deletion if there is no clear consensus in favour of keeping them or no objections to deletion have been raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created — see burden of proof." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.
If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.
|
Examples of what you may request here
- Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version.
- Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
- Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
- Low quality - The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
- Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright.
|
What not to list here
I. For speedy deletion candidates, do not use this page; instead use {{db|reason}}. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
II. Files that have no source, or have an unknown copyright, or are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
- {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated
- {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information
- {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but isn't used in any articles
- {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file
- {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
- {{subst:frn}} if a file has no non-free use rationale
If the source or licensing information of an image marked as being freely licensed is disputed, please list the file on Possibly unfree files
III. Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
- {{isd|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
- {{subst:ncd|image name on Commons}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{subst:ncd}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
IV. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}
V. Suspected copyright violations shouldn't be listed here.
- If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
- For other suspected copyright infringements or licensing issues, use Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
VI. Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
VII. If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criteria 8 for files.
|
Instructions for listing files for deletion
To list a file:
| 1 |
Edit the file page.
Add {{ffd|log=2010 February 8}} to the file page.
|
| 2 |
Create its FfD subsection.
Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:ffd2|File_name.ext|Uploader= |Reason= }} ~~~~
Leave the subject heading blank.
If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons.
|
| 3 |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw|File_name.ext}}
-
- Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
- For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:fdw-multi|First_file.ext|Second_file.ext|Third_file.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)
If the image is in use, also consider adding {{ifdc|File_name.ext|log=2010 February 8}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages.
|
State the reasons why the file should be deleted. Some common reasons are:
- Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name (often abbreviated OB)
- Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} . (often abbreviated OR, not to be confused with original research which generally doesn't apply to images)
- Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos). (often abbreviated UE)
- Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns. (often abbreviated LQ)
- Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright. (often abbreviated CV)
These are not the only "valid" reasons to delete a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.
Since abbreviated deletion reasons will not be familiar to most Wikipedians, especially newbies, please consider using full words. A few extra keystrokes now can save paragraphs of explanation to a panicked uploader wondering what's wrong with their image.
If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.
|
Administrator instructions
To force the server to update this page immediately, purge the cache.
Instructions for discussion participation
In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:
Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.
Instructions for closing discussions
Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps at Deletion Process.
Old discussions
The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:
 |
This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by AnomieBOT (talk) and will no longer be displayed when the backlog is cleared |
For older nominations, see the archives.
Discussions approaching conclusion
Recent nominations
February 2
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. The file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:RoumScientistswiki.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Bci2 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Already available on Wikipedia in the Book Namespace. Redundant pdf version doesn't appear to be required. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. The file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. Reply: the file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:RoumSci BukPDFOkPicts.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Bci2 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Already available on Wikipedia in the Book Namespace. Redundant pdf version doesn't appear to be required. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. The file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. Reply: the file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:SavantiRomani.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Bci2 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Already available on Wikipedia in the Book Namespace. Redundant pdf version doesn't appear to be required. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Reply: This is not a redundant file as stated in the deletion intent message. This file is not available in the PDF format as incorrectly stated here. The file is needed for quick reference use in several Wikipedia articles and should not be deleted. Please do not delete file. Furthermore this file is not available in PDF format anywhere else on Wikipedia or on the web, and there are several problems often encountered with converting the XML files to the correct format and with correct content as in the assembled PDF document provided.
- File:Stalin church 1939.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pudeo (notify | contribs | uploads).
- invalid fair use: not not in article about the image or the author. - Altenmann >t 05:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Unit22SS.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RadicalBender (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Derivative work of a Wikipedia page and the Wikipedia logo but licensed as public domain. Orphaned. Hekerui (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:537361098RgGaIZ ph.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sexyrussian05 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:536.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Behrad18n (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:53386624705 0 ALB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ivankoo (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:531341751 381f331daa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Freesooqing (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:529146.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by 5th floor guru (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:452479934203 0 ALB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Melby19 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:521870632 fc2db30e54.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jimmyjimmy5 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:5190681a6838050241l-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Eddyegghead (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:516626114 l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Firevine (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:5106700-R42-078-37A.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by LAActress47 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:509322423 m.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rckstr4lfe (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:49450001.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Colinjallen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
February 3
- File:Oryz sati Hbt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Madhav Gadgil (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, does not look very useful or unique, bad quality Quibik (talk) 01:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Its a very generic and quite replacable photo of grass. The uploader seems to have left wiki for 2-3 years now. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Luis Herrera, 1980.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Caracas 2000 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:Vikas khanna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by WYDDIT (notify | contribs | uploads).
- low-res publicity photo: likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Irschenberg Wappen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GDuwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete There would be many other images of this same image here. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Jendojuliana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chaldean (notify | contribs | uploads).
- OTRS ticket does not confirm permission, it requests an email. Therefore an F11. MBisanz talk 05:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete This uploader has placed at least 2 other images with fake OTRS tickets already from his talkpage warnings. He cannot be trusted on this image...since no Admin added the OTRS ticket. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, a false OTRS is evidence of a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Hopewell Furnace.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MikeParker (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Image is unused and of low resolution. I doubt it can be used for educational purpose. MGA73 (talk) 08:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral The image could be used in an educational manner as a winter scene, I suppose but its resolution is very low and the image is fairly generic. But to ask that an image be deleted since it is unused is somewhat misleading if it was uploaded by the copyright owner himself. There must be thousands of other orphaned images here with perfectly secure copyright. Just because they are not used is not a good argument for deletion. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
-
- The argument to delete was low quality and that I doubt it will ever be used. I mentioned "unused" because it would worth keeping if it was used. And yes there is probably a lot of orphaned images and if they are not usable then I think that they can be deleted to. But we have to do it case by case. --MGA73 (talk) 09:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I forgot. If the scope is just "winter" then we have commons:Category:Winter with a lot of images in higher resolution. --MGA73 (talk) 09:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This image was used for several years to illustrate the article on the location where the photo was taken, so the argument that it could never be used simply isn't true. Though, if there is some serious issue about an unused image taking up disk space or something like that, feel free to get rid of it. MikeParker (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
-
- Space is not an issue because file will not be deleted but just hidden in some database. You say that it WAS used. Perhaps the reason why it is not used anymore is because it is replaced by something better (higher resolution). In that case I doubt it is likely that the new image will be replaced by the old one. --MGA73 (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: It is good that the uploader is open to deletion if necessary but not necessarily deletion. This is a judgment call for the closing Admin as I have no strong views here and I understand MGA73's statement--that DRs should be done on a case by case basis. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, it shows a part of Hopewell Furnace NHS that's not available in any other free image. A transfer to Commons would make perfect sense. Nyttend (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:3DGlassesDocotorWho.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Andy5421 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- replaceable non-free images. Used to illustrate a section mentioning the glasses. Could be adequately replaced with a free image of what is an object that can be found/purchased. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a free alternative. Having them worn by Dr Who seems unnecessary for significant reader understanding. Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC) - we now have an adequate replacement, File:Anaglyph glasses.png. Thank you Ilmari - Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
if you think you can do better. I searched Wiki for another image of 3-d glasses and it redirected to Stereoscopic with no image of what people typically think of as 3-D glasses. Upload another image if you want. Andy5421 (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep for now unless a free image can be found on Wikimedia Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Works for me. and yes the image accurately represents "3-D glasses". Andy5421 (talk) 05:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 Resolvedcase closed Andy5421 (talk) 08:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:PsychicPaper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Andy5421 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- non-free image that fails to significantly increase reader's understanding and so fails WP:NFCC#8. It's simply an image of a piece of paper and part of a hand - nothing significant about this at all Peripitus (Talk) 10:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
fine I'll upload a better picture Andy5421 (talk) 11:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Done. Well to you it maybe a blank piece of paper :) Anyway. It is a visual aid in understanding what psychic paper looks like. It goes along with the article. Since this is a Doctor Who first for this item(this item has never appeared prior to the 2005 series). I believe a visual representation is necessary for those who have never seen the show before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy5421 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Vortex Manipulator.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sfxprefects (notify | contribs | uploads).
- decorative screen shot used in a list-of article. Image adds nothing significant to reader's understanding and so fails WP:NFCC#8. Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
unless you have watched Doctor Who(2005 series) you would have no idea of what a Vortex Manipulator looks like. A Visual image to go along with the article. Andy5421 (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I agree it should be kept because as a reference so anyone can see what a Vortex Manipulator looks like plus it not a big image Sfxprefects (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Michael Jackson June 23, 2009.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin (notify | contribs | uploads).
- In this case, we don't have to see the what a person looked like in the last days before his death to understand an article about his death. It may be truth in some circumstances (like some illness conditions) that the look of the dying person may be relevant, but in this case, there's nothing on this image that is elucidating for the discussion about the death. Damiens.rf 16:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Please, someone notify the uploader. My firewall believes "SlimVirgin" is pr0n. --Damiens.rf 16:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
-
- Done - Peripitus (Talk) 20:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep this individual is well-known for his constantly changing appearance, and an image of his just prior to his bears relevance on that progression. It appears that MJJ was quite ill by this time, with severe pain and was probably on pain killers. Further, he is dressed in an iconic outfit, similar to his Smooth Criminal costume. An image such as this is able to encapsulate these facts more than mere words. --Blargh29 (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I can see no signs of severe pains or evidence of use of pain killers on this image. But I'm no longer allowed to give medical advice in my country, anyway. In any case, the article about his death does not discus his look prior to his death... and I completely miss the point of having him dressed with the Smooth Criminal costume in the article about the fuss around his death. --Damiens.rf 03:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:NJ the movie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sjcherno (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Replaced by a better version Sjcherno (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, claims to be copyrighted and it's not likely that the uploader has the right to license this freely. Nyttend (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Pedestrian Safety Stop Arm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GRUBBXDN (notify | contribs | uploads).
- No reason given to believe "this image was not copyrighted". Source being a Wikipedian's "personal collection" makes all information about this photo unverifiable. Damiens.rf 19:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Why would it have been copyrighted? If it's taken during the production of something for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it would be a work of the US federal government. Nyttend (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Good Humor Salesmans Handbook.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GRUBBXDN (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unnecessary book cover for a book that's not mentioned on the article. Damiens.rf 19:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, fails nonfree content criteria. Nyttend (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I was the author and the work was never copyrighted. Further, the book is mentioned in the article.(GRUBBXDN (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC))
- File:Ccccd.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Rajeshmichael (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC) The file is of poor quality and will be made obsolete shortly. There is also conflicting and inaccurate licensing information for this image. Collin College will replace the image with a higher quality, properly licensed version of the logo.
February 4
- File:Rogercotes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by QueenAdelaide (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Non-free, possibly copyrighted photo. Fails NFCC because a free picture of this bust could be taken. -Nard 00:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Day length quick.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Roland Longbow (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:Pencil beam.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Charly_Whisky (notify | contribs | uploads).
- PNG version available. No need for this GIF -- Jalanpalmer (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0309.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Drabikrr (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0477 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0493 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0521 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0560 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0398 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0508 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0464 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0576.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alexanderbilar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, possible copyvio. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0563 sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by David w ng (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0508.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Swindonx (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 07081.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wiblackburn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Campfire opposite.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wiblackburn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0544.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wiblackburn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 1023.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Onetwo1 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DSC 0607woodQuay1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by CharlieCLC (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Woodquayapts.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Heggyhomolit (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:American buff geese at 5 months.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Freely-licensed photographs, even low quality ones, of rare poultry and livestock breeds are very hard to come by. As such, any photo we have of the American Buff Goose should be copied to Commons and kept. I have added this to the appropriate article. Steven Walling 07:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Article appropriate. Chris (talk) 13:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:American buff goose at 12 months.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Freely-licensed photographs, even low quality ones, of rare poultry and livestock breeds are very hard to come by. As such, any photo we have of the American Buff Goose should be copied to commons and kept. Steven Walling 07:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep File is freely licensed. It may be low quality, but it is what we have until better images can come along. Chris (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, file is in use and quite encyclopedic. Perhaps transfer to Commons? Nyttend (talk) 15:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:American buff goslings at 5 weeks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Freely-licensed photographs, even low quality ones, of rare poultry and livestock breeds are very hard to come by. As such, any photo we have of the American Buff Goose should be copied to Commons and kept. Steven Walling 07:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Image is freely licensed. Chris (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, file is in use and quite encyclopedic. Perhaps transfer to Commons? Nyttend (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Gazebo Tricia Nixon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Geographer (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, potentially useful image without problems; for example, this could be used at Tricia Nixon Cox if there were enough text there to justify another image. Move to Commons, however. Nyttend (talk) 15:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I could be just having a brain fart, but I'm thinking Freedom of panorama may apply here. Normally, I think of gazebos as buildings. But unlike some other gazebos, this one appears to be more mobile. Mobile enough that got moved from the White House to the Nixon Library. Could this gazebo possibly be considered a work of art? If so, that might make it a non-free image.--Rockfang (talk) 04:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Seems to me to be as functional as anything else. I don't see gazebos as buildings any more than I see cars or chairs as buildings, but I see them all simply as normal objects. If nothing else — surely gazebos don't carry copyright notices, and since this was used for a wedding in the early 1970s, it's clearly public domain because of the lack of a notice. Nyttend (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:HPIM0483.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dzelinsk (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 21:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a personal image server. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 04:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
February 5
- File:Crappy head unit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and transfer to Commons: appears to be a clear, well-focused image of technology that may be dying out. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and transfer, quite a useful image that easily falls within Commons scope. Nyttend (talk) 05:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - without copying to Commons. I can't think of any potential article this could be used in.--Rockfang (talk) 06:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Blonde hair Daniel Christensen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Lighting seems off and orangey which makes this a poor choice to illustrate blonde hair. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Guy with nice hair.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and transfer to Commons: image can potentially be used to illustrate articles relating to hair colour. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Blonde hair.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and transfer to Commons as image can potentially be used to illustrate an article on hair colour. ("File:Guy with nice hair.JPG" may be a better image, though.) — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Marantz Model 2235.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like an encyclopedic photo to me. Could illustrate several articles. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Not only could it illustrate an article, it did. It was illustrating the article Marantz 2235, which it seems eminently suited for, by definition, even, when it was removed by ... the nominator. [1] Fastily then quickly came here, and wrote this image was orphaned and unencyclopedic (because he had just removed it from the encyclopedia!), and "Use not stated", which, frankly ... :-( --GRuban (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep no reason it couldn't be used in Marantz 2235. Although I would recommend the contributor dust off the amplifier and table before taking pictures for the encyclopedia, maybe remove the CDs too.--kelapstick (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, nominator's removal isn't a good reason to claim that this is orphaned. This is akin to nominating a category for deletion because it's empty after an out-of-process removal of all its articles; how many more images were in use until just before nomination for deletion? Nyttend (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - the file is on Commons now.--Rockfang (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:80s stuff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete The focus issues here are problematic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete poor focus, Miscellaneous unrelated electronics, no encyclopedic use in my opinion.--kelapstick (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Center channel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete should be replaced with a better quality image. Preferably one that uses the text box feature of paint rather than writing it using the paintbrush. I'm also not crazy about the flash in the television, but what do I know, I take horrible pictures...--kelapstick (talk) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. The image is crude because of its content. It shows an absolutely horrible speaker setup, a terrible example, with two speakers fighting for center channel placement, and four more struggling to define left and right. Left and right symmetry has been lost with one loudspeaker turned sideways. Jagged scratchy letters have been drawn digitally with a shaky mouse hand on the photo above the loudspeakers, rather than a font used from a paint program. Dust on the camera lens created spots on the image when the flash hit the dead video screen and reflected. Homemade loudspeakers look like they were thrown together from car speakers but with no engineering consideration—they will certainly cause severe comb filtering. This image fails in so many ways, but its main purpose, to show a center channel speaker, has been lost in the decision to put two speakers near the center. Binksternet (talk) 09:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. As above, and because the concept Center channel is better shown by a simple diagram than by an amateurish photograph full of irrelevant distractions. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: So it's not better than nothing? Think that way when it comes to some of these. Daniel Christensen (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Listening room.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep I think more explanation in the caption of what is depicted in the photo would be useful as far as what the equpiment is and what a listening room is all about. But the image looks good to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete poorly focused collection of miscellaneous unrelated stereo equipment. Question, is a listening room just a room you go to listen to music? If so this doesn't illustrate a "listening room" it illustrates "equipment in the listening room".--kelapstick (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Too many pieces of equipment cause a loss of focus on any one; setup is faulty with components not hooked up. Doesn't demonstrate a listening room as much as a collection of unlikely stereo components. Not encyclopedic. Binksternet (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Carpet door.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and move to commons. A fine illustration of carpeting being used to improve the sound proofing qualities of a door. Looking at the soundproofing article, it would be good to add it there as this common technique does not seem to be illustrated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep interesting subject, might be better suited at commons.--kelapstick (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, clearly useful. Nyttend (talk) 05:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:My instruments.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Move to commons would be good. Seems to be a reasonable image to illustrate some popular instruments in Western culture. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not much is really identifiable, and the keyboard is in a really awkward position. I don't see much encyclopedic use for a mix of random instruments, minimum it should be renamed to something descriptive. --kelapstick (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I see no encyclopedic use for a random bunch of electronic instruments. Nothing is notable about this user's particular instruments. The reflection on the acoustic guitar is distracting. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Gemini mixer and MCS EQ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:Antenna beam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral The lighting isn't great in this photo and it's not clear to me from teh caption exactly what's being shown. This is a directional antenna? It seems like it's possible to get a better photo than this one? ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete recreate during the day without a person in the picture. If you need to give perspective of size, find an object that is always the same size (yard stick, dollar bill etc.)--kelapstick (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Bad lighting, bad angle and cropping reduce visibility of the antenna the image is meant to show. Glowing eyes and a defocussed bit are distractions. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Over 100 miles away signal strength.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, possible copyvio. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Is this image useful as an illustration? ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete no real use (that I can see), and likely a copyvio (screenshot of TV program in the background).--kelapstick (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Studio monitors.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Crop and move to commons is that an option? I think it could be useful there, but as is, it has too much "background".--kelapstick (talk) 00:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. These rough loudspeakers are not studio monitors. They were assembled from wood and car speaker parts in a manner completely devoid of audio engineering knowledge. Binksternet (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral. Agree that "studio monitor" is a poor title but I would not criticize the image for showing reasonable home-made speaker cabinets. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Square magnet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Looks encyclopedic and useful. A stronger caption might be nice expaining what we're looking at, but its seems good to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Decent illustration of the back of a speaker. --kelapstick (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Move to Commons — this is quite an encyclopedic image. Nyttend (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Good focus and composition. Binksternet (talk) 10:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. The magnet is both square and I think ceramic type. Illustrates these properties well.
- File:Listening room.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete poorly focused collection of miscellaneous unrelated stereo equipment. Question, is a listening room just a room you go to listen to music? If so this doesn't illustrate a "listening room" it illustrates "equipment in the listening room". (Same as previous)--kelapstick (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep this; delete the next one; File:Homemade studio.JPG. But keep this one.
- File:Homemade studio.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Appears encyclopedic. An improvement of the caption with more details of what's in the picture and how it's used might be nice. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete poorly focused collection of miscellaneous unrelated stereo equipment. Same as listening room.--kelapstick (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Deja vu - Have already seen this setup as "Listening room" and now there is a distracting handset on the right hand speaker. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:First Act bass and electric guitars.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Good illustration of one brand of electric guitar and bass. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, only orphaned because the nominator removed it. Useful image, although it should be moved to Commons. Nyttend (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Pacard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Encyclopedic and useful illustration of this type of warning sign. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, although ideally should be moved to commons, would have more uses there.--kelapstick (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral but the file name should be spelled Placard. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Tower base.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Does the image illustrate something about the way radio towers are constructed or grounded? ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Bent mast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Seems like a good photo of a roofline and antenna. Is the title indicating it's intended just to show a bent antenna? I think it woul dbe a good illustration (potentially) for this style of eves and gabling as well as gutter issues. But maybe not. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Canandaigua radio tower-what is it for?.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Nice photo. Perhaps someone can help identify what type of tower it is and what it's used for. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. The nominator removed this photo from the article Canandaigua (town), New York with this edit, where it was the only photo of any part of the town. Then he waited a few hours and nominated it for deletion on the grounds that it wasn't used in any articles! That's somewhere between intellectual dishonesty and outright vandalism, and I'd expect better of any editor, but especially an administrator. :-( If this tower is, as seems likely, the tallest structure in the town, it's a perfectly appropriate and encyclopedic illustration for the article. It's also, as observed by Child of Midnight, a really beautiful photo. --GRuban (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong keep, nominator's reasons appear disingenuous, as it's plainly useful. Nyttend (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Wow that photo is nice! I never noticed that; the way it's just at dusk makes it rather picturesque. Daniel Christensen (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep but the title should not raise a controversy (unless that aspect is notable in an article). The size of the image in the article may need to be reduced if consensus arises that the picture is more artistic than important. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Alex O.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, copyvio. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not a great illustration of a desktop. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor composition, not useful. Binksternet (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing notable. Bad snapshot of a screen. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:File name taken!.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unless someone can indicate what it illustrates. A taped headphone? ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even the file name claims anything notable. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Attenuation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Looks encyclopedic to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Dimensia Victrola.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: What it is illustrating is the use of the Victrola trademark; a known antique record player; well into the 1980s for something completely unrelated; a television set; in this case RCA's high end Dimensia model. This would surprise a lot of people. Daniel Christensen (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Screen backing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a useful illustration of a constructed backing for a projection screen. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong comment: How the heck can he get off calling that "low quality" it's not blurry at all; the camera I use is a cheap Olympus 10 MP model but when the flash is on it's always clear; the color quality and other things are not great; not nearly as good as my old 5 MP Kodak; but still. 19:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Actually, that doesn't have the metadata; that means that I did take that with the kodak camera; that's a fine picture then. Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Sony.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Focus could be a bit tighter, but it shows a dual tape deck sony product with "autoreverse". ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Dimensia remote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like it would be good to include on commons. Well shot. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:RCA Dimensia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete I don't think it's a great shot for showing something distinctive and encyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Dimensia control.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:DimensiaIO2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete Seems to be illustrated better in next photo. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Dimensia Interface.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep Encyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Admiral.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Move to commons? Good illustration of a classic Admiral radio which also shows the knob adjustments that used to be features. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Wall of microwaves.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. It's an interesting photo and it shows a lot of different styles and models of mocrowave, but it's not very sharp. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral The bottom section should be cropped to remove the distracting monitor. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Dual.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete The quality (focus) of the image is not great. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Boss Audio.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep:Shows a dynamic view of all of one brand of something. Daniel Christensen (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. The image is too busy to feature the BOSS products, the two Diablo speaker drivers. There are too many other elements cluttering the image and drawing attention away, including a lace tablecloth, Lego toy pieces, an audio amplifier of unknown make, a Makita portable drill, a bottle of white glue, a portable CD player, a candlestick, clothing or fabric, china tableware, and a stack of puzzles and books—one of which is, appropriately enough, Clutter's Last Stand: It's Time to De-Junk Your Life! This is not the environment in which one would expect to encounter the BOSS product and so it is not typical, not a good example. Binksternet (talk) 00:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: That is a Boss amp! How can you be able to read that blurry book title in the background but you can't see that the amp is a boss; it's even visible at far; when the image is at it's preview size! Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Here is the image caption from the Boss Audio page: A 15 inch speaker box with 15 inch Boss Diablo subwoofers and a D1300.2 Boss Diablo amp; 1.5 cubic foot per chamber sealed; recommended size for the speakers
- File:Barn theater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete focus is not good. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Soundesign1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Image is not of good quality. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Real12.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- The subject matter seems like it might be useful but the picture quality is not great. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Anylite.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
One of these two shoul dbe kept and moved to commons. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Anylite2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:ErgonomicMouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- The lighting is not very good. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:BetterDCC.jpg).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:Dimensia intelligent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:BazookaSub.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete QUality of image is not good. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Allis D19.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
-
- This picture of an Allis-Chalmers D Series agricultural tractor has a fairly obvious use, isn't orphaned, and isn't unencyclopedic. Quality is a relative concept. If we don't have a better picture of the subject, this one will do. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Wood splitter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILYsock
|
|
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2010+February+2%23File%3A5040+%288%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2010+February+5%23File%3ABetterDCC.jpg%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
